User Tag List

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 40

Thread: Bigger Cigars?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Ruler Of The Galaxy Emperor Zurg's Avatar
    First Name
    Emperor
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Gamma Quadrant, Sector 4
    Posts
    3,008
    Ring Gauge
    1292
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    92 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cigarer View Post
    See most people on here that like smaller sized cigars. I prefer robusto or toro sometimes. Who likes the churchills?
    I usually go for robusto or petit corona. Reason being, the more flavorful cigars often tend to be full strength as well and a churchill is too much vit N for me. I don't like a nic buzz at all; it just makes me dizzy and nauseated. That and I just don't have the patience to sit around long enough to smoke a churchill.
    Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

  2. Likes droy1958, Ciro, Haebar, Brimy, allusred liked this post
  3. #2
    The Guido Squad Ciro's Avatar
    First Name
    Ciro
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Jersey Shore
    Posts
    2,010
    Ring Gauge
    1148
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    638 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ring gauge plays more of a factor then the cigars length. I've tried the larger ring sizes, but I don't enjoy them as much as a 50 or 52 RG in any length.

  4. Likes allusred, TreySC, Brimy, droy1958, Haebar liked this post
  5. #3
    Monster Bum DogRockets's Avatar
    First Name
    Jeremy
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Fort Wayne, IN
    Posts
    2,261
    Ring Gauge
    1026
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    695 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I guess I pay attention to both girth and length. (That's what she said)

    I'm not a fan of Churchill size (or longer) cigars normally as I find the draw to be too hard until the first inch or two has turned to ash. So normally I don't smoke cigars longer than 6 or 6.5 inches. There are exceptions of course, but that is my general rule.

    On ring gauge I tend to like them bigger than most people on here. For me a 52-58 is a great size. I do go up to 60 for Nubs and a couple others (Asylum 13 is great in the 60 RG). I smoke stuff under 50 RG from time to time but it's not my go to.

    In conclusion, smoke cigars!

  6. #4
    Jumpin’ Railcars and Collectin' Cans Ilroy's Avatar
    First Name
    Bill
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Reno NV
    Posts
    517
    Ring Gauge
    299
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I started out smoking mostly robusto and toro size, but as I've progressed, I find that I tend to prefer a bit smaller in RG. I mostly smoke corona and petite corona size these days, although I still do go as thick as 50-52 sometimes. Length is only a factor in how much time I have at a sitting to smoke. If I have the time and an appropriate amount of scotch or brandy, a longer smoke is fine with me.

  7. Likes TreySC, Ciro, Brimy, allusred, droy1958, Haebar liked this post
  8. #5
    Administrator jhedrick83's Avatar  Cigar Bum Sponsor
    First Name
    Jesse
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ol' Rocky Top
    Posts
    6,571
    Ring Gauge
    1443
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    621 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I like the traditional Churchill (48 rg) but sadly I don't usually have time for 2.5-3 hours to dedicate to enjoying one. I also think it's harder to get a good Churchill in the NC side. Like Jeremy, said a lot of them aren't always the best constructed cigars. I think small RG and Churchills/Double Coronas are two things Cuba excels at. That's just my opinion though.

    I guess in a way they can be like Lanceros. A well rolled and appropriately blended Lancero is exceptional, but finding well rolled and appropriately blended Lanceros can be difficult and not every blend translates well to the size.
    "Hate, it has caused a lot of problems in the world, but has not solved one yet."
    ― Maya Angelou


    Go Vols!

  9. #6
    Custom User Title Bruck's Avatar  Cigar Bum Sponsor
    First Name
    Bruce
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Prince William County, VA
    Posts
    2,969
    Ring Gauge
    1107
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    178 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I used to think I was a "value shopper," buying the larger length and volume sticks, but pretty much just get robustos and smaller toros now. With the tree trunk cigars, after about an hour and a half I find myself thinking, how much longer do I have to smoke this thing?
    You oughta know not to stand by the window, somebody see you up there.

  10. Likes Ciro, Emperor Zurg, allusred, droy1958, Haebar liked this post
  11. #7
    Lonely Wandering Bum Slowpokebill's Avatar
    First Name
    Bill
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    36
    Ring Gauge
    35
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I prefer cigars with ring gauge in the mid 40's and smoke a lot of petite coronas. I don't mind sticks with a ring gauge in the low 50s and I do smoke plenty of Robustos. I buy Illusion Rs by the cabinet.

    Now to the question of Churchills; is there a more perfect cigar for a lazy afternoon or an evening by the fire. If I'm just going to be chilling fora few hours I'm all for a Churchill. The upper 40's ring gauge fits in my wheelhouse and I don't mind 6 1/2-7 inch cigar if I have a couple of hours to enjoy it. Smoke time is really a function of length for me. A 5 inch petite corona and corona gordas are a 1 to 1 1/4 hour smoke. A 4 1/2 Rubusto is maybe a 45-50 smoke. A Churchill is an hour and half to two hour smoke.

    If I've got the time a Churchill is fine.

  12. Likes allusred, AlanS, Ciro, droy1958, Haebar liked this post
  13. #8
    Royal Bum
    First Name
    Steve
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Joplin MO
    Posts
    6,171
    Ring Gauge
    1712
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    595 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Most of the time I don't want to smoke a cigar longer than 60-75 minutes. So I usually stay within those sizes. I love petite coronas, which is usually a 45-60 minute smoke for me.

  14. Likes AlanS, Ciro, droy1958, Haebar, Usafvet509, allusred liked this post
  15. #9
    Administrator Nature's Avatar
    First Name
    Mark
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    6,580
    Ring Gauge
    1910
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    675 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I don't mind the larger cigars. It usually depends on the setting. The ideal size for me when sitting on my back deck in warmer weather relaxing on an evening would be a Toro. I don't really mind the big 60 RG cigars, but it's not my favorite. When I'm on the Golf Course, I prefer the larger and longer cigars. Unless it's cold or I'm pressed for time, the little cigars leave me wanting for more.

  16. Likes allusred, AlanS, Ciro, jhedrick83, droy1958, Haebar liked this post
  17. #10
    Wow, Someone Knows Me Jaybird's Avatar  Cigar Bum Sponsor
    First Name
    Jay
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Redding CA
    Posts
    386
    Ring Gauge
    131
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I LOVE a 60 Rg if its not longer than like 4 to 4.5" after that I get bored. Lately I have been trying to find that OMG cigar in the 40-45 RG size. All I have been finding is the CC's. Everything else I have been approaching seems to be seriously sucking. Either they are WAY to strong and WAY to harsh or they are just crap and not worth smoking or keeping. The short CC's seem to be just about right these days.

    I am TOTALLY open to suggestions though to a AMAZING 30 min smoke..

    Cheers
    Jay

  18. Likes Ciro, jhedrick83, droy1958, Haebar, allusred liked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •