This is by no means a disrespectful criticism of your contributions. You regularly contribute reviews, and I'm happy to see you regularly plugging away at them even though there isn't much interaction within them to give you an insight into how they're being recieved. Job well done, in my book.

However, since you are asking for criticism, and I don't mind opining to hopefully give you that insight:

I suggest stepping outside of your normal format. A lot of your reviews read almost exactly the same, and almost seem like a format of - copy/paste of the draft, insert a score, and edit the technicals. Maybe add a bit of personality. Maybe take what you've learned by how typically format a review, and restructure it to something a bit YOU.

Just my $0.02, Sean. Hope you receive this well and as a constructive response rather than my criticism.